About this Journal
The Graduate Teaching Assistant Journal for Sam Starbuck, Theatre MA at the University of St. Nowhere.
Current Month
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
Jul. 15th, 2010 @ 08:28 am (no subject)
LJ is purging old accounts that haven't been logged into or updated for 24 months (I will have a post up about this at Copperbadge later today). So I am updating this journal to protect it from purge. That is all, carry on!
About this Entry
[info]copperbadge:
Mar. 10th, 2007 @ 12:19 pm (no subject)
Oh man. So many issues with this in so many ways.

1. Lifting material from the internet is stupid. Plagiarism in general is stupid, and worse, it's rude. It insults the person scoring your paper with the assumption that they can't tell you're copying from someone else. Nine times in ten, they can. Not a single semester went by at grad school where I didn't catch at least one plagiarist, often more. Some copied from their significant others, some copied from their roommates, some copied from the New York Times (for the WIN), but even without much context it's generally possible to tell when someone's not using their own words.

2. That having been said, I don't buy that all the instances that the study found were necessarily plagiarised. Having read well over five thousand papers on little more than twelve prompts among them...well. If you raise a given population with the same curriculum and the same scoring strategy, and then give them all the same prompt, odds are the majority or at least a highly significant minority will come up with similar methods of addressing it. The kids taking the standardised essay tests that I scored weren't dumb -- they knew that the question was loaded and angled, and so they fulfilled expectations, and as a result we got nine jillion papers on Why My Idol Is My Dad.

3. Taking all of this into account, and including the fact that a website was able to collect and distribute examples of "successful essays", and further taking into account that all over the world you can take classes which increase your chances of getting into college by telling you how to write an entrance essay...

How about we stop being offended that students think entrance essays are a waste of time, and start looking into why?

Seriously, if you've got at least five percent of your population cribbing from a website (just as high or higher in America, I would imagine) don't you think maybe, just maybe, you're doing something wrong? I'm not talking about teaching kids ethics, I'm talking about building a system where kids aren't cynically forced to write insipid, insincere essays on prompts they don't respect.

If you're trying to get into college, you're not a moron. You're already bored of "why I want to go to college" or "what a meaningful experience in my life taught me". If you're actually deserving of higher education, you're capable of more, and you should be given an opportunity to show your passion instead of an opportunity to kiss a little ass.

Students shouldn't plagiarise. Full stop. And yes, there will always be some who will, no matter what the standard. On the other hand, the ratio of plagiarists to honest students rises sharply when students feel they're being treated like idiots. They stop caring, as well they should. Teachers, especially at university and starting with an entrance application, should provide real challenges and standards so that the deserving students care enough to do their own work.

It's a simple equation: treat people like grownups and most of them will act that way.
About this Entry
[info]copperbadge:
Jun. 20th, 2006 @ 02:57 pm (no subject)
Well, you pays your money and you takes your chances.

It's just a thought, but all that effort put into locating and procuring a microscopic earphone might have been better spent reconsidering your choice of major, given how little attention you're willing to pay to the subject matter.

Or, you know.

You could have spent that time studying.
About this Entry
literate academic with teeth
[info]copperbadge:
Apr. 15th, 2006 @ 01:52 pm (no subject)
Post for the week -- next week may be the last post from this job. Thank god, in a way...

Kids often make references to things I've never heard of, so a lot of times I'll write them down and look them up later. Some of the more interesting references have been:

Vash the Stampede: An anime character, who was the "hero" the student wrote their essay about.
The Moustrap Car: A mousetrap car is apparently a kind of soap-box-derby machine that runs on the power provided by the spring mechanism of a mouse trap. Go fig.
Rasulullah: As I understand it, this is an archaic name for the prophet Muhammad. What's intriguing about this paper is that I assumed Rasulullah was a mythic Islamic folk-hero of some kind, because the kid wrote that he lived ten thousand years ago. Then again, the kid also misspelled his name.
Maggie: A Girl of the Streets: A rather awful-looking novella by Stephen Crane. This came up several times; I think some class must have read it.
Kevin Carter: A photojournalist who actually led quite an interesting life.
Chip Foose: Hod-rod mechanic and tv superstar.

And we have Gems! )
About this Entry
special - Master of Arts
[info]copperbadge:
Apr. 12th, 2006 @ 10:34 pm Flag Paper
So I had my first Flag paper tonight.

There are several kinds of papers that we are not qualified to grade, most notably the papers that are too short, too off-topic, or too confusing for someone with a week's training. Those are marked No Grade and sent on to people specially trained in dealing with them.

The final kind of paper is a Flag Paper. When a paper is flagged, that means first it goes to the manager, then to the school that the student attends, and then potentially to the police and Child Protective Services.

We don't Flag for drug abuse, petty theft, underage drinking, or consenting underage sex, especially if it's mentioned in a past tense situation. What we do flag for are things like muder confessions, child abuse, and rape. These children are told, and encouraged, to compose fictional stories, so there's sometimes a fine line, but it's fairly easy to tell the difference between a story about a rapist and an essay about being raped.

Tonight I had a paper about a girl whose major adult influence is her father, though she wishes he would just "blow away on the wind and never return". She talks about how he affects her behaviour, her schoolwork, and her actions, all in fairly vague terms, but in the present tense -- and with enough detail for me to surmise that her father is a Very Bad Person.

Normally, being a cynic to start with, I detach pretty well, otherwise I'd despair of the human race. I didn't detach particularly well from that paper. I kept grading and finished out my shift, but after the paper went through to him and Manager, Longhorn pulled me out of grading and bought me a soda in the breakroom just to be sure.

I know that rapists and child molestors exist. I know several survivors of childhood incest. I've dealt with troubled students before, though not in this particular way. What got to me is that this girl is at least sixteen, and she's clearly never told anyone before, and for some reason a written exam essay was the place she chose to reach out. She sounded so tired and afraid. She wrote really well, too.

I don't know what I make of it all. The written word is very powerful. The urge to tell our own stories, especially to an audience who can't see our faces, is a theme I've dealt with many times, both here and in my formal scholarly studies. Creativity trumps fear. I don't know. I don't even know if I'll ever find out what happens to her and her father, I don't know if they tell us that kind of thing.

I'm not -- upset, precisely, though it is of course upsetting. I'm just trying to fit tonight into my headspace, and it doesn't immediately go.
About this Entry
[info]copperbadge:
Apr. 7th, 2006 @ 10:13 pm (no subject)
Gems. My brain is dead. )
About this Entry
[info]copperbadge:
Apr. 7th, 2006 @ 11:48 am (no subject)
I'd just like to state for the record that someone you admire is not your admirer, your admiral (unless you admire someone in the Navy), or your idle.

That's all, really.

Gems! )
About this Entry
literate academic with teeth
[info]copperbadge:
Apr. 3rd, 2006 @ 11:08 pm (no subject)
I haven't been on the ol' GTA journal in too long!

I must say that my new favourite was worth the wait. One of my students had the following to say in a paper about the famous men and women she admires:

At times like that, I just ask myself, what would Johnny Depp do?

For a start, love, he'd probably write more than three paragraphs on a two-page essay. And I bet you wear a lot of hats, don't you.

Although this is very, very closely followed by:

I smoked crystal myth.

I also had two papers which, while not quotable, certainly deserved mention. One was about a family of stray cats; the protagonist, Jack, wanted to be just like his older brother Spot. He even did drugs like his older brother Spot did. Yes, drugs. Cats doing drugs. And one day, while they were high on Crystal -- perhaps even crystal myth! -- a Great Dane ate Jack. That was when Spot discovered the diary that JACK THE CAT kept and realised he'd ruined his brother's life.

There are no words.

The other paper was quite clever actually; it told the story of the student's ESL teacher, and how he found her crying yesterday because she was worried he wouldn't do well on his essay. Basically, the essay could be summed up in the phrase "Please don't make my ESL teacher cry". It worked, too. I passed him.

Gems. )
About this Entry
[info]copperbadge:
Mar. 21st, 2006 @ 10:44 pm (no subject)
New Gems! )
About this Entry
[info]copperbadge:
Mar. 15th, 2006 @ 10:32 pm (no subject)
I guess these kids have some kind of fascination with superhero costumes, since the top gem of the past three nights is clearly:

I'm not saying that admiring Batman means you have to fight crime in tights.

Gems! )
About this Entry
literate academic with teeth
[info]copperbadge: